News
More Midsize Banks Forming SAR Committees to Avoid Reporting Mistakes, Say Compliance Professionals
By Brian Monroe
printOnce confined to large banks, the practice of forming teams to review suspicious activity reports ahead of regulatory filing deadlines is increasingly being adopted by midsize financial institutions, say compliance professionals. The groups, known as SAR committees, can help anti-money laundering (AML) compliance teams better explain complex financial activity, avoid regulatory reporting errors and document their decisions, they say. Since the mid-2000s, most large banks have adopted the practice, which is not required under federal regulations. "The decisions on SARs are so important and there are so many ramifications that the decision is better made by committee," said Robert Serino,...
TO READ THE FULL STORY
Related News
Federal law enforcement agencies will ask multiple financial institutions next week to take part in a pilot program intended to improve how banks identify suspicious clients and communicate with investigators.
The transfer of billions of dollars in deposits out of large banks to smaller competitors is likely to increase the compliance work and woes of credit unions and community banks.
The nation's financial intelligence unit expects the number of bank suspicious activity reports on remote deposit capture services to rise in the coming years, according to a bureau report.
Nearly 60 percent of the suspicious activity reports filed in fiscal 2006 had missing, incorrect or incomplete data in fields critical to law enforcement agencies, according to a federal watchdog report.
Poorly thought out responses to law enforcement requests for additional information on suspicious activity can end up exposing banks to civil lawsuits or regulatory actions, according to compliance professionals.
The current design of federally-mandated suspicious activity reports makes it difficult for banks to report important information tied to suspected mortgage fraud, say former law enforcement agents and consultants.
New York HIFCA director discusses the importance of well written SARs and the organization's efforts to bridge the communication gap between the financial sector and law enforcement.
If a bank releases too much or too little information or takes too long to respond to a request from law enforcement officials, an investigation might be bogged down or even compromised.
As lawmakers and banking compliance professionals turn their attention to the burgeoning credit crisis, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has issued a dozen Bank Secrecy Act-related enforcement actions, serving to warn institutions not to skimp on their anti-money laundering efforts.
FinCEN, which drew its conclusions from a review of filings mostly from money service businesses, said other common errors included missing or inaccurate identifications, telephone numbers, Social Security numbers and other data.
Financial institutions often must move quickly to file SARs within regulatory deadlines, but those that move too hastily could be held accountable for failing to include enough detail.